The tool helped stop 45 flawed studies informing clinical guidelines for polycystic ovary syndrome.
Articles on Scientific misconduct series
Displaying all articles
‘Open science’ is a radical shift from traditional research practices. But it can help research integrity in several ways.
‘Fast science’ can damage research integrity – just as fast food can damage your health. ‘Slow science’ offers an alternative path forward.
Some academic publishers have been accused by scientists of being “too greedy” and prioritising profit over research integrity.
The peer review process is central to science – but it can be easily manipulated. Improving it is vital to uphold research integrity.
How can the science community minimise the risks but maximise the benefits of AI?
In 2023, more than 10,000 research papers were retracted because of scientific misconduct. But it’s not always deliberate.
Top contributors
-
Associate Professor, School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney
-
Professorial Fellow (Artificial Intelligence), Melbourne Business School, The University of Melbourne
-
Director, AI for Science, CSIRO
-
Adjunct Associate Professor, Office of the PVC (Academic Innovation), Southern Cross University
-
PhD Candidate, School of Media, Creative Arts and Social Inquiry, Curtin University
-
Dean of Research, Humanities, Curtin University
-
Director, Centre for Culture and Technology & Curtin Open Knowledge Initiative, Curtin University
-
Associate professor, Australian National University
-
Visiting Fellow, Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, Australian National University
-
Director of Monash Centre for Health Research Implementation, Monash University
-
Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University
-
Senior Research Fellow in Women's Cardiometabolic Health, Monash University