Articles on Preprints
Displaying all articles
AI infractions could result in a year-long ban from the arXiv system, which is an essential communication channel in many fields of research.
A new study shows AI writing is turning traditional measures of research quality upside down.
Peer review is often assumed to guarantee quality, but it doesn’t always work so well in practice.
We don’t yet know the health effects of microplastics in the brain. But until we find out more, it’s best to limit our exposure to plastics where we can.
Preprints are often free to use, making them more accessible for journalists to report on. However, as they have yet to undergo peer review, science journalists take a gamble on their accuracy.
How the ‘smoker’s paradox’ went up in a puff of smoke.
Preprints are scientific papers made available before being published in a peer-reviewed journal. The Australian Research Council has banned researchers from citing them in grant applications.
The pandemic has shifted how early stage, unreviewed scientific papers are used and viewed.
The peer-review process is an essential part to ensure the quality of scientific research, but the pandemic-driven demand for information means that research is publicized before it has been reviewed.
Scientific results are being rushed out quicker than ever to fight coronavirus. Here’s what you need to know about preprints, peer review and the difference between the two.
In our institutions of higher education and our research labs, scholars first produce, then buy back, their own content. With the costs rising and access restricted, something’s got to give.
The traditional mode of publishing scientific research faces much criticism – primarily for being too slow and sometimes shoddily done. Maybe fewer publications of higher quality is the way forward.











