Trump Media and Rumble joining X in legal fight against the Brazilian Supreme Court marks a new era of deregulation pushes.
Articles on Free speech online
Displaying all articles
Misinformation suppression laws can actually make the problem of erroneous beliefs worse.
Florida and Texas sought to prevent social media companies from deciding which posts can be promoted, demoted or blocked. The Supreme Court said the tech companies can moderate as they please.
Online extremism is a unique challenge – terrorists use methods that can’t be captured by standard content moderation. So, what can we do about it?
These cases have asked the justices to consider how to apply some of the most sweeping constitutional protections – those of free speech – to an extremely complex online communication environment.
The Supreme Court will hear five cases this term that will examine the nature of online discussion spaces run by social media platforms.
We should be concerned about the sweeping discretion social media companies have over so much of our speech.
Top contributors
-
Professor Emeritus of Communication and Rhetorical Studies, Syracuse University
-
Associate Professor of Law, Quinnipiac University
-
Adjunct Senior Fellow, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland
-
Senior lecturer, Deakin University
-
PhD Candidate in Free Speech, Democracy and Social Media, Deakin University
-
Deputy Director, Institute for Ethics, Governance & Law, Griffith University
-
Professor
-
Professor in Information Systems, The University of Queensland
-
Associated Expert at the Technology and Global Affairs Innovation Hub, Sciences Po