As my research into jurors and jury decision making shows, our system is far from perfect.
Articles on Jury decision making
Displaying all articles
Educating mock jurors about what kinds of statements are appropriate − or not − led to more critical assessments of forensic testimony and improved the quality of their decisions.
Research into contextual bias needs to be more rigorous so recommendations can be made about its effect on forensic analysis.
Top contributors
-
Lecturer in Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University
-
Associate Professor of Psychology, Florida International University
-
Assistant Professor of Psychology, Florida International University
-
Doctoral Candidate in Legal Psychology, Florida International University
-
Professor of Psychology, Florida International University
-
Psychology Researcher, Edinburgh Napier University