The Supreme Court can still invalidate the newest national injunction and allow the order to go into effect anywhere it is not currently barred from doing so. That would create administrative chaos, the authors write.
Articles on injunctions
Displaying all articles
What is the purpose of US District Courts
and Court of Appeals, and why do some courts have multiple judges and others have only one?
The Supreme Court just made it harder for judges to block presidential policies nationwide, but lawmakers hold the key to changing that.
There’s no one set legal definition for sanctuary cities and other places with these policies. But they often limit local coordination with federal immigration authorities.
Do court-imposed nationwide injunctions, which stop policies for everyone across the country, give too much power to a single judge? Or do they protect important rights?
Pro-Palestinian protesters occupying the University of Toronto dismantled their encampment in advance of a deadline issued by the university after being granted a court injunction.
Canadian universities’ requests for court orders and police enforcement to clear Palestine solidarity encampments raise questions about the legal status of encampments and the use of injunctions.
It’s not certain that the ruling will make it harder for fired union organizers to get their jobs back, a labor law professor explains.
The case stems from a complaint filed after seven baristas who were attempting to organize a union at a Starbucks shop in Memphis, Tenn., were fired.
The case stems from a complaint filed after seven baristas who were attempting to organize a union at a Starbucks shop in Memphis, Tennessee, were fired.
If passed, B.C.’s Bill 45 will trample over the constitutional rights of unhoused people by ignoring shelter barriers, Indigenous rights and the need for daytime shelter
Forced marriage protection orders are not very useful in combatting ‘honour’-based violence or other abuse.
The social cost helps regulators factor in harm from climate change when they consider new rules and purchases, like buying electric- vs. gas-powered trucks for the Postal Service.
There is a stronger public interest in privacy than in revealing salacious showbiz title-tattle, no matter what the papers say.
Celebrities should not be able to get the British legal system to do their dirty work for them.
Top contributors
-
Professor of Law and Director, Workplace Law Program, Texas A&M University
-
Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Professional Ethics, Case Western Reserve University
-
Fellow in Energy and Global Oil, Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University
-
Professor of Gender, Violence and Work, University of Lincoln
-
Fellow in Energy Studies, Baker Institute for Public Policy; Lecturer, Rice University
-
Professor and Canada Research Chair in Law, Society & Sustainability, University of British Columbia
-
Professor of Criminology, Centre for Gender and Violence Research, University of Bristol
-
Associate Professor, Law, University of Victoria
-
Associate Professor, Peter A. Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia
-
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Windsor
-
Associate Professor of Disaster and Emergency Management, York University, Canada
-
Professor of Political Science, San Diego State University
-
Associate Professor of Political Science, University of New Mexico
-
Professor of Legal Studies and Political Science, UMass Amherst
-
Richter Professor Emerita of Political Science, Swarthmore College