Some people argue that no matter what humans do, life will persist.
Articles on Environmental philosophy
Displaying all articles
The bill promises to prevent environmental damage and harm where possible, but what will this entail?
For an ecologist working in a tangle of creeks in North Queensland, crocodiles are a tangible threat. We are food to them, yet we must learn to co-exist with these creatures.
Climate change is an emergency which will hurt the planet’s most vulnerable people – the only irrational response is cool detachment.
A new survey exhibition of contemporary artist Janet Laurence urges us to reconsider the relationship between art, nature and politics.
Many people associate Henry David Thoreau with solitude in the outdoors. But Thoreau understood in the mid-1800s that there was no such thing as nature separate from humans.
It’s time to admit the age of pristine nature is over. In its place is humanity and planet-shaping technologies, from gene editing to climate engineering. Earth Day in a Synthetic Age.
It’s as if Socrates’ remark that ‘the trees teach me nothing’ is very much still the attitude today.
An anthropologist argues for new ways to value sacred landscapes.
Yes, humans hold awesome power over the rest of the planet, but nature will always fight our attempts to ‘tame’ the natural world.
A philosopher of ‘procreation ethics’ at the center of a controversy over having kids explains why we can’t ignore the population question in an era of climate change.
Scientists need to be comfortable dealing with subjective views, rather than empirical data, and people’s feelings to make progress in addressing climate change.
A narrow debate of what countries should pay to respond to climate change obscures a bigger moral discussion that touches on economics, ethics and people’s relationship to the natural world.
More than 2,000 academics, including philosophers and ethicists, are urging global leaders at the Paris climate summit to focus on the moral dimensions of climate change.
Proponents of Big History say science provides a better sacred story for humanity than traditional faiths. Will this lead to an era of better stewardship of the environment?
Australia wants to kill off two million feral cats and momentum for similar plans is growing in the US. Is there a good case for killing or neutering outdoor cats to protect biodiversity?
Should conservationists ‘sell’ the value of nature by focusing on the ecosystem services nature provides people? Surveys show this may be the wrong tack.
Proposals to set aside vast tracts of land for wildlife raise ethical questions, challenging the human-centric view of the value of life.
A philosopher’s thoughts on how an individual can overcome the feeling of helplessness in the face of global climate change.
Top contributors
-
Founder of PAN Works and Research Scientist at the Marsh Institute, Clark University
-
Scientist and Director of Research Communication for the Arizona Water Innovation Initiative, Arizona State University
-
Associate Research Professor of Anthropology, University of Colorado Denver
-
Professor, Department of Community Sustainability
-
Associate professor, The Ohio State University
-
Professor, Michigan Technological University
-
Professor of Philosophy, University of Montana
-
Professor of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy, Oregon State University
-
Department Chair and Professor of Philosophy, Rochester Institute of Technology
-
Professor of Environmental Studies, Affiliate Faculty in Religious Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara
-
Director of the Master of Bioethics degree program at the Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University
-
Senior Lecturer, Philosophy, Anglia Ruskin University
-
Professor of Earth Science, University of Connecticut
-
Lecturer and Researcher in Plant Humanities, UNSW
-
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, James Cook University