- Professor of Law, University of Virginia
Investors want to buy the basketball team for a record sum.
Celebrity probate battles deal with the same legal issues that courts handle every day for many families that are not in the news.
Federal policy changes are likely to make life harder for many Americans of modest means as they age.
The court’s decision sends the mifepristone case back to a lower court, which has signaled that it will continue its challenge to the legality of mailing the abortion pill.
Even after death, managing wealth can be complicated, slow and deeply contested.
Selling a sports team is much more complicated than selling assets found in a typical estate, such as houses and cars.
Four years after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs ruling gave states the power to ban abortion, further restrictions are arriving through legislation and litigation.
These rules have a long history in the United States. They played a role in the notorious murders by the Menendez brothers and Scott Peterson.
What makes Brooke Hogan’s case unusual is that she asked to be disinherited to avoid a court battle over her celebrity father’s estate.
The drama playing out over the late actor’s assets offers valuable lessons for anyone leaving an estate – large or small – to their loved ones or a favorite charity.
Choosing the right person to manage the assets you leave behind can be just as important as selecting who will inherit your property.
The ruling limits the rights of Medicaid patients to choose their own health care provider. It could have consequences far beyond South Carolina.
Only a tiny fraction of Americans are rich enough for it to matter anyway. And many wealthy taxpayers already locked their existing assets into estate plans that they can’t change.
The court’s decision on whether Medicaid patients can choose their own health care provider could have consequences far beyond South Carolina.
New restrictions on how children and teens can spend time online remain concentrated at the state level.
Even after departing this world, artists have plenty of legal tools to protect their creative vision.
Iowa and Idaho have passed abortion trafficking laws that stop people from helping minors get abortions. These laws open the door for questions about the right to travel to get an abortion.
Restrictions that seem reasonable during life can backfire after death.
Even the most careful trust planning is no substitute for family harmony.
O número de pacientes que receberam prescrição de terapia hormonal despencou após 2002, devido a descobertas que os especialistas questionaram desde então. Com uma melhor compreensão, mais e mais pessoas estão usando esses tratamentos.
The Supreme Court conceded that it should not have taken up the case to begin with.
The opinion did not take on the substance of the plaintiffs’ claims against mifepristone, and the abortion pill is already facing other challenges.
The number of patients prescribed hormonal therapy plummeted after 2002, due to findings experts have since questioned. With better understanding, more and more people are using these treatments.
EMTALA requires hospitals to provide stabilizing treatment to all patients – but Idaho is arguing that its abortion ban means it doesn’t have to allow the procedure, even if it is medically needed.
Two legal scholars who study abortion-related laws explain what happened at the Supreme Court in a case that could make it harder to get an abortion.
Contact Naomi for
- General
- Media request
- Speaking request
- Consulting / Advising
- Research collaboration
- Research supervision
- Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, U.S.
- Website
- X (formerly Twitter): @naomicahn
- Article Feed
- ORCID
- Joined
























