To let others decide how our money will be used is an abrogation of responsibility.
Articles on UniSuper
Displaying all articles
Just four of Australia’s 20 biggest super funds still have no emissions reduction targets or commitments.
The super fund for health workers plans to dump its shares in companies that mine fossil fuels. The super fund for university staff is a long way behind.
Compelling Australians to put even more into super runs the risk of giving them a better standard of living in retirement than they had while working.
Despite recent reforms, the superannuation system is still beset with problems such as high fees and patchy performance. You need to pay attention if you want to make sure your nest egg’s in the best hands.
There are increasingly very sound financial reasons for super funds to strategically divest from some areas.
Top contributors
-
Adjunct Professor, Curtin Law School and Curtin Business School, Curtin University
-
Associate, Grattan Institute
-
Associate Professor, University of Tasmania
-
Professiorial Fellow, The University of Melbourne
-
Program Director, Housing and Economic Security, Grattan Institute
-
Head of National Programs, Climateworks Centre
-
Adjunct Senior Research Fellow, School of Media, Film and Journalism, Monash University
-
Associate Professor of Management, The University of Melbourne
-
Associate Professor of Management, The University of Melbourne
-