Philanthropists give for many different reasons, but bequests could decline by about $7 billion a year.
Articles on Taxes
Displaying 181 - 200 of 228 articles
While people often want to cheat in certain cases if it would benefit them, they also want to think of themselves as honest. Here are three steps to stay honest while filing taxes.
Congress changed the tax system to benefit companies with overseas operations but failed to help Americans actually living abroad, who still face punitive taxation.
The ethical and political reasons to avoid free higher education are unambiguous.
Despite all their anti-tax sentiments, Republicans from Hoover to Trump have embraced this levy on sales at the pump.
In many respects, President Jacob Zuma’s free higher education proposal in South Africa is the worst kind of populism.
New York, California and other high-tax states are angling to use the charitable deduction and state payroll taxes as workarounds to shield both their residents and their revenue.
Historically, wishful thinking has blunted pushback.
Giving could decline by $21 billion or more per year.
If Americans become less healthy and have less access to health care, then everyone loses.
If Republicans don’t cut taxes on the wealthy when they have control of both houses of Congress and the presidency, what do they live for?
Universities play a vital role in promoting economic growth, something the writers of the Republican tax plan have apparently forgotten.
Far from dispelling the notion among Americans that the system is ‘rigged’ against them, Republican tax plans are more likely to make matters worse.
The House just passed its version of the tax plan, which includes about US$1 trillion in cuts for corporations. The question, who will be left holding the potato?
Republican lawmakers say the proposed changes to the tax code would ‘streamline’ higher ed benefits. But this overhaul would squeeze many, if not most, students and schools.
Supply-side economics is the intellectual backbone of the argument that tax cuts for the wealthy will boost business investment, wages and growth. The evidence suggests otherwise.
The Republican tax plan would ultimately make the current system less progressive while reducing the overall burden, two things research shows make countries less happy.
Republicans rewriting the tax system have a rare opportunity to fix a major problem: most women-owned companies can’t take advantage of key provisions designed to help small businesses like theirs.
Outrage over tax reform is nothing new. But if we can’t be calm about tax, we can at least learn from the stories spoken in anger.
President Trump recently released his tax plan, but he’s also said he wants to stimulate the economy with infrastructure spending. Is one more effective than the other at boosting growth?
Top contributors
-
Associate Professor of Business, Boston University
-
Professor Emerita of Law, Vanderbilt University
-
Lecturer in Public Policy, University of Michigan
-
Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh
-
Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra
-
Professor of Accounting, The Ohio State University
-
Professor of Law, University of Richmond
-
Assistant Professor of Accounting, Youngstown State University
-
Glenn Family Chair Emeritus of Economics and Philanthropic Studies, Indiana University
-
Research Fellow, Institute of Development Studies
-
Associate Professor of Accounting, Boston College
-
Sr. Professorial Lecturer & Managing Director of Kogod Tax Policy Center, Department of Accounting and Taxation, American University Kogod School of Business
-
Professor of the Practice of Data Science, Washington University in St. Louis
-
Assistant professor, Canada Research Chair in Taxation, Governance and Risk, University of Waterloo
-
Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Director of the Philip C. Cook Low-Income Taxpayer Clinic, Georgia State University