Our study shows the way bank bosses talk about risk can negatively affect financial stability.
Articles on SVB
Displaying all articles
Financial crises are inevitably followed by legislation to restructure the banking system, and the ongoing problems with bank stability are likely to be no exception.
The failure of Silicon Valley Bank has exposed gaps in financial regulation that could be tricky to fill.
The Fed raised rates by a quarter-point – less aggressive than had been expected before the current banking crisis, but signaling inflation is still its focus.
There are two types of systemic risk that can infect the highly interconnected global banking system.
The chances of any bank in Australia or New Zealand following the trajectory of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse is effectively zero.
Companies benefit from certain internal environmental and social checks and balances, particularly when it comes to preventing a tumble in their share price.
The banking crisis has been caused by the interest rate rises, and further hikes were supposed to be a no no.
Top contributors
-
Professor of Economics, University of Nottingham
-
Professor of Economics, Skidmore College
-
Lecturer in Finance, University of St Andrews
-
Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor) in Accounting, Newcastle University
-
Associate Professor of Economics, West Virginia University
-
Lecturer in Economics and Finance, University of Huddersfield
-
Associate Professor of Economics, Skidmore College
-
Associate Professor of Finance, University of Nebraska Omaha
-
Senior Lecturer in Economics, University of Huddersfield
-
Senior lecturer, Canberra School of Government, University of Canberra
-
Senior Teaching Fellow in Economics, Lancaster University
-
Director, Latin American Business Environment program, University of Florida
-
Head of Department of Economics, Finance & Accounting, Brunel University of London