UK politicians are planning very different approaches to data privacy, security and surveillance.
Articles on Investigatory Powers Bill
Displaying all articles
Are we seeing Orwell’s dystopian vision of 1984 coming to fruition?
The Snooper’s Charter has cleared parliament, but there might still be a way to stop the government collecting all our internet histories.
By choosing to talk to MI5’s most outspoken press critics, the spy boss has made a very shrewd move.
Will the Lords give the Investigatory Powers Bill the scrutiny it deserves?
Insecurity by design, as the FBI or UK government would have it, is pouring petrol on an already raging fire.
The battle between personal privacy and national security online continues.
Having aggressively marketed its privacy credentials for the last two years, Apple’s contribution to the consultation is not surprising.
Less is often more – acting quickly in the wake of atrocities rarely leads to good laws.
The Investigatory Powers Bill would require ISPs to store 12 months of our web browsing history – a year-long snapshot of our thoughts, fears, interests and behaviour.
The Investigatory Powers Bill raises plenty of questions. Here are the answers.
The snooper’s charter is here, and it’s as bad as expected. Here’s three problems that need fixing.
Top contributors
-
Lecturer in Information Technology, Intellectual Property and Media Law, University of East Anglia
-
Reader in Journalism, City St George's, University of London
-
Professor of Cybersecurity, Head of School of Computer Science and Informatics, De Montfort University
-
Associate professor, Flinders University
-
Professor, Cyber Security, Aston University
-
Professor, Information Security Group, Royal Holloway, University of London
-
Head, The Cyber Academy, Edinburgh Napier University
-
Professor of Global Legal Studies, Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham
-
Research associate, University of Cambridge