The Enhanced Games wound up on May 24 2026 without the medal shower that was widely expected, but what does the multi-sport event really stand for when it’s stripped of the moral frenzy?
Articles on Enhanced games
Displaying all articles
New research dispels many of the myths Enhanced Games organisers are sprouting.
We’re outraged that the Enhanced Games allows doping, yet fans happily watch boxers suffer brain damage. The real scandal is the hypocrisy about athletic harm.
Olympic medal-winning swimmer Ben Proud wants a shot at the prize money – but competing in Las Vegas could tarnish his legacy.
Big money ‘mega events’ often undermine sport’s values in front of millions of spectators.
A plans for ‘Enhanced Games’ with no restrictions on performance-enhancing drugs would be bad for athletes and for sport itself.
Will allowing doping open new horizons of sports performance?
Top contributors
-
Director, UC Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra
-
Senior Lecturer in Ethics, Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Swansea University
-
Visiting Scholar, School of Business, CBR, UNSW
-
Researcher in Philosophy of Science and Public Policy, Hokkaido University; Bangor University; University of Bristol
-
Professor of Ethics and Sports Integrity, KU Leuven
-
PhD Candidate in Biomedical Sciences (KU Leuven) & PhD Candidate in Sport Sciences (Norwegian School of Sport Sciences), KU Leuven
-
Senior Lecturer in Sociology of Sport, Exercise and Health, Liverpool John Moores University
-
Senior Research Fellow in Public Health, The University of Queensland
-
Lecturer in Sport Integrity, Swansea University
-
Research Fellow in Public Health, The University of Queensland
-
Professeur de Sociologie et Sciences et techniques des activités physiques et sportives, Université Paris Nanterre
-
Professeur de sociologie, sciences du sport, faculté des sciences sociales et politiques, Université de Lausanne, Université de Lausanne
-
Professeur de philosophie politique, Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)