AI might have ‘PhD-level’ intelligence. But substituting it for a PhD student sacrifices a special part of the academic ecosystem.
Articles on Anthropic
Displaying 41 - 60 of 62 articles
Anthropic’s Claude is helping the US military choose targets to strike in Iran, but responsibility for the accuracy, strategy and ethics of the decisions rests with humans.
Anthropic’s refusal to allow the U.S. Department of War unrestricted access to Claude raises questions for many nations.
Questions about ethical AI may go out the window when democratic norms are collapsing.
Low-cost Chinese-made AI could outcompete premium US models – and it won’t be an accident.
At the heart of this dispute is how Anthropic’s large language model Claude is being used in a military context.
Even if you’ve never used these software tools, your employer probably has. Now, AI threatens to upend the systems businesses have relied on for years.
AI systems began a major shift in 2025 from content creators and chatbots to agents capable of using other software tools and acting on their own.
Anthropic says its Claude Code tool was used in a sophisticated, automated campaign to steal sensitive information.
Two new books reveal the gap between the promises of AI companies and the reality. One exposes the industry’s questionable ethics. The other argues we’re racing to extinction.
Workplace productivity and educational challenges get the headlines, but it turns out that ChatGPT and its ilk are more likely to be used for household tasks.
Despite the hype surrounding AI, the technology is far more fragile than it might appear.
In stress-testing AI models, it’s not hard to push them to the brink and make them threaten to harm humans.
There’s too much debate about the small details, not enough focus on AI being here to stay.
Chinese AI companies have grown rapidly, despite several technological and political challenges. So what’s their secret?
Other big tech companies such as Meta and OpenAI have also recently allowed for more military uses of AI. So why is this happening now?
More efficient AI models may make research easier – and raise questions about the value of investments in huge datacentres.
2025 may be the year of AI agents that can carry out tasks on our behalf – but the technology has a couple of big hurdles to get past before it will really be useful.
Humans may still appear even if the universe were very different. In fact, we may not live in the most likely of possible universes.
The tech giant previously prohibited people from using its AI software for military purposes. The shift poses challenges not just for the public – but militaries as well.
Top contributors
-
Professor of Information Systems, McGill University
-
Professor of Cybersecurity, School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne
-
Senior Lecturer, School of Engineering, Australian National University
-
Guest Research Fellow, School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne
-
Senior Lecturer in Data Analytics in the Social Sciences, Deputy Director of the Centre for AI, Trust and Governance, University of Sydney
-
Lecturer, Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University
-
Head of School (Computer Science) and Co-Director (Centre for Data Science), Queensland University of Technology
-
Professor of Accountancy, University of Notre Dame
-
Professor of Accounting & Business Information Systems, The University of Melbourne
-
Professor and Associate Director of the Centre for Change and Complexity in Learning (C3L), Education Futures, Adelaide University
-
Affiliated Faculty Member, Carnegie Mellon Institute for Strategy and Technology, Carnegie Mellon University
-
Professor, School of Private & Commercial Law, UNSW
-
Research Fellow, Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University
-
Professor of Political Theory, Queen Mary University of London
-
Associate Professor of Machine Learning and Director of the Sydney AI Centre, University of Sydney