China and Russia view the latest Washington intervention in the Middle East as a further decline of the United States’ global power.
Articles on Global leadership
Displaying all articles
The power vacuum in world leadership means New Zealand and other small states will have to create a new rules-based international order.
During the Global Financial Crisis, the world benefited from American leadership. That is missing – along with any logical replacement – in the current crisis.
Despite agreeing to a ceasefire, the two sides offered differing depictions of their trade war truce that show a lasting peace may still be out of reach.
Now is the time for China to put its technological and diplomatic skills on display in its quest for superpower status.
Some worry the US is losing its global moral authority under the Trump administration. But a close look at history reveals US leadership is not as strong as it seems.
American presidents have spent a great deal of time proclaiming US leadership of the global system. The decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement undermines much of what they have said.
Top contributors
-
Co-Director, Institute for Genocide and Mass Atrocity Prevention, and Professor of Public Administration, Binghamton University, State University of New York
-
Co-Director, Institute for Genocide and Mass Atrocity Prevention, Professor, Department of Philosophy, Binghamton University, State University of New York
-
Professor in The Division of Global Affairs and The Department of Political Science, Rutgers University - Newark
-
Distinguished visiting professor, University of Glasgow
-
Assistant professor, The Education University of Hong Kong
-
Professor of International Relations, University of Otago
-
Global Fellow at the Wahba Institute for Strategic Competition, Associate Professor at the University of Arizona, University of Arizona
-
Tony Walker AM is a Friend of The Conversation.
Director, La Trobe University
-
Professor of Political Science, Tufts University