Tolerance for the use of force in the conflict in Cameroon has undermined the appeal of dialogue and negotiations.
Articles on Ambazonia
Displaying all articles
Cameroon’s leadership has a history of rebuffing outside intervention in the country’s internal affairs. This has hampered efforts to resolve the anglophone crisis.
Nigeria is beset with security threats. Confronting them will take regional and international cooperation.
The Cameroonian government’s pursuit of military victory is likely to prolong the war.
Anglophone grievances run deep and have remained unaddressed for a long time.
Leaders’ efforts to end conflict have been ineffective. Working through regional economic communities might be part of a better approach.
The African Union’s intervention track record in conflict situations is mixed.
Many believe that it is only a return to the country’s two-state federation that will end the conflict and break the impasse.
What Cameroon needs is a properly mediated process signing all the parties to a pre-agreed agenda
In many instances, social media appears to be amplifying violence, creating a culture of impunity when perpetrators are not held accountable, and increasing insecurity and suspicion.
Top contributors
-
PhD candidate in Political Studies at the Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Johannesburg
-
Executive director, Africa Institute of South Africa, Human Sciences Research Council
-
Professor, Coventry University
-
Director & SARChI Research Chair: Political Economy of Migration in the SADC Region, University of Pretoria
-
Adjunct Lecturer, University of Toronto
-
Assistant Professor of Africana Studies, Lafayette College
-
Adjunct Professor, University of Toronto
-
Assistant Professor, University of Warwick
-
Ph.D. candidate in Global Governance and Human Security, UMass Boston
-
Professor of History, University of Dayton
-
PhD Fellow, swisspeace Mediation Program, University of Basel