Nathalie Chalifour

The Sudbury 17 wildfire burns east of Mississagi Provincial Park near Elliot Lake, Ont., on June 4, 2023. (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry/The Canadian Press via AP)

Court decision in youth climate lawsuit against Ontario government ignites hope

Canadian courts are increasingly holding governments accountable for violating their citizens’ human rights by not doing enough on climate change.
La Cour suprême du Canada a rejeté la demande d'annulation de la tarification nationale du carbone. La Presse Canadienne/Adrian Wyld

Voici ce que l’arrêt de la Cour suprême sur la tarification du carbone signifie pour la lutte contre les changements climatiques

La Cour suprême du Canada a reconnu la gravité du changement climatique et a justifié le pouvoir du Parlement d’adopter des lois en vue d’assurer « la paix, l’ordre et le bon gouvernement ».
The Supreme Court of Canada rejected the request to strike down national carbon pricing. The plan is key to reaching net-zero emissions by 2050. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

What the Supreme Court ruling on national carbon pricing means for the fight against climate change

In its decision, the Supreme Court of Canada recognized the gravity of climate change and upheld the idea that Parliament has the authority to act on matters of “peace, order and good government.”
After a six-month delay, the Supreme Court of Canada is hearing arguments against the federal carbon pricing system. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

Supreme Court case on carbon price is about climate change, not the Constitution

The Paris climate change agreement aims to limit global warming to 1.5C above pre-industrial temperatures — and the federal carbon pricing plan was meant to help Canada meet its commitments.

Contact Nathalie for

  • Media request
  • Speaking request
  • Research collaboration