Joeri Rogelj

3

Articles

0

Comments
Forest, Uganda. Julie Ricard, Unsplash

Planting trees to remove carbon can harm the environment – or protect it: study highlights trade‑offs

Ruben Prütz, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research; Gaurav Ganti, Humboldt University of Berlin; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA); Joeri Rogelj, Imperial College London, and Sabine Fuss, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

Carbon removal strategies may conflict with biodiversity conservation, but careful choices could bring benefits.
Further warming hugely increases the risk we will pass climate tipping points, such as the collapse of Greenland’s ice sheet. Michal Balada / shutterstock

Overshooting 1.5°C is risky – that’s why we need to hedge our bets

Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA); Gaurav Ganti, Humboldt University of Berlin, and Joeri Rogelj, Imperial College London

Investing in carbon removal, on top of the most ambitious emissions cuts possible, is a no-regrets strategy.
Shutterstock

The 1.5°C global warming limit is not impossible – but without political action it soon will be

Bill Hare, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research; Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Humboldt University of Berlin; Joeri Rogelj, Imperial College London, and Piers Forster, University of Leeds

Humanity can still limit global warming to 1.5°C this century. But political action will determine whether it actually does. Conflating the two questions amounts to dangerous, misplaced punditry.

Contact Joeri for

  • General
  • Media request
  • Speaking request
  • Consulting / Advising
  • Research collaboration
  • Research supervision