Edition

David Danks

6

Professor of Data Science, Philosophy, & Policy, University of California, San Diego

Ethicists wrestling with AI’s responsibility for its actions, vis-a-vis its creators’ responsibility, could learn a few things from theology. 'The Creation of Adam' from the Sistine Chapel, by Michelangelo/Wikimedia Commons

September 10, 2024

Medieval theology has an old take on a new problem − AI responsibility

David Danks, University of California, San Diego and Mike Kirby, University of Utah

Autonomous AI is still designed by people − so who or what is really responsible for its actions? For centuries, theologians have posed similar questions about mankind and God.

Hands off – but do we trust the car? AP Photo/Eric Risberg

December 30, 2016

Finding trust and understanding in autonomous technologies

David Danks, Carnegie Mellon University

The ethics and psychology of trust suggest ways we might learn to understand self-driving cars, but also show why doing so might be more challenging than we expect.

Contact David for

General
Speaking request
Consulting / Advising
Research collaboration
Research supervision

Location: La Jolla, California, U.S.
Website
Article Feed
Joined December 9, 2016