Cinq principes pour éviter les mésusages des modèles mathématiques, afin qu’ils éclairent avec justesse les décisions politiques.
- Open Evidence Research, UOC - Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
Conservatives have long tried to attack regulators such as the EPA with “weaponized transparency”. Coupled with the inflation of uncertainty, the intent is to make regulations impossible.
Nailed to the door of the London School of Economics, the ‘33 Theses’ offer a long overdue challenge to economics dogma. But there are omissions as well.
The final report of the EU’s summit in Sweden makes generous use of the adjective “fair”. With populism and xenophobia are on the rise, could this be the basis of a new narrative for Europe?
We are observing two new phenomena. On one hand doubt is shed on the quality of entire scientific fields or sub-fields. On the other this doubt is played out in the open, in the media and blogosphere.
How can we improve the PISA standardised tests?
Insisting that science has a monopoly on the truth invalidates dissent and undermines what should be an open dialogue between science and society.
Trump is not science’s biggest problem.
Scientists must bear some responsibility for the post-truth era and the current crisis in democracy.
Is the election of Donald Trump going to reignite a futile war between science and anti-science?
Science’s quality control processes are under question. Scientists should think about changing the rules and extending their peer communities.
Contact Andrea for
- General
- Media request
- Speaking request
- Consulting / Advising
- Research collaboration
- Research supervision
- Location: Open Evidence Research, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Barcelona
- Website
- X (formerly Twitter): @AndreaSaltelli
- Article Feed
- ORCID
- Joined
