Industry has renewed confidence after Boeing made commitments to redesign aircraft and train pilots
Articles on Ethiopian Airlines crash
Displaying all articles
High-profile rail and aerospace disasters of recent years have been the deadly consequence of the systematic erosion of safety precautions due to deregulation.
Government regulators and industry experts often overlook the complexities and risks of human-technology interactions and increasingly rely on companies’ voluntary oversight and self-assessments.
A human-centred approach to machine design can help make machines safer and more efficient.
Pilots get lots of assistance from automation as it is. In the future, they’ll get even more.
The inquiries can take months of painstaking work, but often yield important insights that improve flight safety for everyone long into the future.
An analysis of flight data shows that problems began at a point when the pilot would normally have engaged the autopilot system.
Top contributors
-
Professor of Practice for Aerospace Engineering, Arizona State University
-
Professor of Human Factors, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
-
Associate Professor, Human Systems Labs, University of Windsor
-
Assistant Professor of Graduate Studies, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
-
Ph.D. Student in Human and Social Dimensions of Science and Technology, Arizona State University
-
Assistant Professor of Aviation, University of North Dakota
-
Senior Fellow, Centre for Free Expression, Toronto Metropolitan University; York University, Canada
-
Associate Professor, Aerospace Engineering & Aviation, RMIT University
-
Associate Professor, School for the Future of Innovation in Society and The Polytechnic School; Co-Director Center for Smart Cities and Regions, Arizona State University